Resource Usage same In spite of fronting my DB server with Pgbouncer ?

  • Jump to comment-1
    KK CHN<kkchn.in@gmail.com>
    Jan 23, 2026, 6:08 PM UTC
    List,
    I am fronting my postgres 16 server with pgbouncer1.23.1
    What surprises me, even though I am deploying pgbouncer as a separate VM
    in front of DB server VM, the top command shows the almost same resource
    usage statistics in the case of load averages, Memory usage etc on the DB
    Server, whether I am infronting DB server with pgbouncer or not.
    Please find the top output from the db server pasted here.
    https://glot.io/snippets/hf4ilogbz0
    My Pgbouncer server top output shows littler resource usages in terms of
    CPU, MEM usage
    on the top out put of pgbouncer VM ( load averagaes less than 3 always,
    and Ram usage is very low, swap usage almost nil..
    Why eventhough I have deployed pgbouncer for this setup why DB server
    still shows large resource usage as in the pasted out put.
    How can I improve the resource usages on DB server ? what is the root
    cause DB server's still high resource usage ?
    Any hints are most welcome .
    My pgbouncer.ini config params pasted here for any valuable suggestions
    for fine tuning.
    [root@pgbouncer ~]# grep ^[^\;\;] /usr/local/etc/pgbouncer.ini
    [databases]
    recoil = host=dbmain.erss.in port=5444 dbname=recoil
    [users]
    [pgbouncer]
    logfile = /var/log/pgbouncer/pgbouncer.log
    pidfile = /var/run/pgbouncer/pgbouncer.pid
    listen_addr = *
    listen_port = 5444
    auth_type = md5
    auth_file = /usr/local/etc/pgbouncer.users
    admin_users = myuser
    stats_users = myuser,
    pool_mode = transaction
    maxpreparedstatements = 100
    serverresetquery = DISCARD ALL
    serverresetquery_always = 1
    ignorestartupparameters = extrafloatdigits, options, statement_timeout,
    idleintransactionsessiontimeout
    maxclientconn = 5000
    defaultpoolsize = 50
    minpoolsize = 30
    reservepoolsize = 10
    reservepooltimeout = 5
    maxdbconnections = 900
    maxuserconnections = 800
    server_lifetime = 3600
    serveridletimeout = 60000
    [root@pgbouncer ~]#
    Regards,
    Krishane
    • Jump to comment-1
      Adrian Klaver<adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>
      Jan 23, 2026, 6:48 PM UTC
      On 1/23/26 10:14 AM, KK CHN wrote:
      List,
      I am fronting my postgres 16 server with  pgbouncer1.23.1
      What surprises me,  even though I am deploying  pgbouncer as a separate > VM in front of DB server VM,  the top command shows the almost same > resource usage statistics in the case of load averages, Memory usage etc > on the DB Server,  whether I am infronting DB server with pgbouncer or not.
      Please find the top  output from the db server pasted here.
      https://glot.io/snippets/hf4ilogbz0 https://glot.io/snippets/hf4ilogbz0
      My Pgbouncer server  top output  shows littler resource usages in terms > of CPU, MEM usage
      on the top out put of  pgbouncer VM ( load averagaes  less than 3 > always,  and Ram usage is very low,  swap usage almost nil..
      Why eventhough I have deployed  pgbouncer  for this setup why DB server > still shows large resource usage as in the pasted out put.
      That would seem logical to me as pgBouncer is just passing the connections to the Postgres server, the server is doing the heavy lifting of dealing with statements in the connections.
      From the top output it looks like you are working with some form of a EDB product. You need to specify what that product is and it's version. This list is for the community version of Postgres and people will assume that is what you are talking about. There are folks that maybe able to help with EDB versions, but they need to know what it is.
      Regards,
      Krishane
      • Jump to comment-1
        KK CHN<kkchn.in@gmail.com>
        Jan 23, 2026, 7:41 PM UTC
        On Sat, Jan 24, 2026 at 12:18 AM Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>
        wrote:


        On 1/23/26 10:14 AM, KK CHN wrote:



        List,
        I am fronting my postgres 16 server with pgbouncer1.23.1

        What surprises me, even though I am deploying pgbouncer as a separate
        VM in front of DB server VM, the top command shows the almost same
        resource usage statistics in the case of load averages, Memory usage etc
        on the DB Server, whether I am infronting DB server with pgbouncer or
        not.

        Please find the top output from the db server pasted here.

        https://glot.io/snippets/hf4ilogbz0 https://glot.io/snippets/hf4ilogbz0


        My Pgbouncer server top output shows littler resource usages in terms
        of CPU, MEM usage
        on the top out put of pgbouncer VM ( load averagaes less than 3
        always, and Ram usage is very low, swap usage almost nil..


        Why eventhough I have deployed pgbouncer for this setup why DB server
        still shows large resource usage as in the pasted out put.

        That would seem logical to me as pgBouncer is just passing the
        connections to the Postgres server, the server is doing the heavy
        lifting of dealing with statements in the connections.
        You mean to say the SQL statements are making this issue ? I also
        suspected wrongly formed query statements making this much load on the DB
        server.
        I also suspect this, as the developers who write queries are not so
        expertised for writing optimized queries, needs to be addressed separately.
        How can I find out which query statements are making the DB server on its
        knees ? Any method to find the bad queries? what parameters/behaviours to
        be checked for finding those query statements which really makes the
        db server to its knees by the heavy lifting ? any hints most welcome, I
        can explore and fix those ones.

        From the top output it looks like you are working with some form of a
        EDB product. You need to specify what that product is and it's version.
        Sorry I missed to mention it, this is an EDB 16 server. Eventhoug I
        prefer to use any piece of S/W that is FOSS community editions, sometimes
        it is demanded to manage these products too.

        This list is for the community version of Postgres and people will
        assume that is what you are talking about. There are folks that maybe
        able to help with EDB versions, but they need to know what it is.

        Regards,
        Krishane