pgsql-hackers
❮
Discarded adjust_relid_set() return values in remove_self_join_rel
- Jump to comment-1SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM<satyanarlapuram@gmail.com>Apr 25, 2026, 7:45 AM UTCHi hackers,
I found that removeselfjoin_rel() in analyzejoins.c discards the
return values of two adjustrelidset() calls when updating
root->allresultrelids and root->leafresultrelids:
toKeep->relid);adjust_relid_set(root->all_result_relids, toRemove->relid,
toKeep->relid);adjust_relid_set(root->leaf_result_relids, toRemove->relid,
adjustrelidset() does not modify its input in-place. When it finds
the old relid in the set, it calls bms_copy() to create a new
Bitmapset, performs the substitution on the copy, and returns the new
pointer. Without capturing the return value, the original sets are
never updated. Every other call site in the file analyzejoins.c correctly
assigns the return value.
I am not able to craft a query to show it as a problem.
For the current release, these two lines appears to be a no-op?
Attached a patch to assign the returned values.
Thanks,
Satya- Jump to comment-1Tender Wang<tndrwang@gmail.com>Apr 25, 2026, 7:53 AM UTCHi,
SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM <satyanarlapuram@gmail.com> 于2026年4月25日周六 15:44写道:
Hi hackers,
I found that removeselfjoin_rel() in analyzejoins.c discards the
return values of two adjustrelidset() calls when updatingroot->allresultrelids and root->leafresultrelids:
adjustrelidset(root->allresultrelids, toRemove->relid, toKeep->relid);
adjustrelidset(root->leafresultrelids, toRemove->relid, toKeep->relid);
The topic in [1] seems to be the same issue as your report.
adjustrelidset() does not modify its input in-place. When it finds
the old relid in the set, it calls bms_copy() to create a new
Bitmapset, performs the substitution on the copy, and returns the new
pointer. Without capturing the return value, the original sets are
never updated. Every other call site in the file analyzejoins.c correctly
assigns the return value.
I am not able to craft a query to show it as a problem.
For the current release, these two lines appears to be a no-op?
Attached a patch to assign the returned values.
You can take a look at [1] to double-check.
[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAMbWs49fYQcqJfJ_Gtn8r1GFNoYtb1%3D2AUab4ieuqY4Zid9ocQ%40mail.gmail.com
(Sorry for not adding pgsql-hackers mail in the last email)
--
Thanks,
Tender Wang